The Danger of Tolerance | Part Two

May 27, 2016

by Dr. William F. Harrell

*This post was taken from Dr. Harrell’s website and is used by permission

This politically correct world in which we live expects the church to operate within limitations to call someone into question for moral and spiritual lapses. The worst thing one can do today is to tell someone they are wrong. Correction is tantamount to an insult. Why, there is no right and wrong any more. “What’s right for me is right for me and you had better not tell me that I am wrong.” That is the mantra of this politically correct world in which we presently live. Sadly, the church has been drawn into believing and practicing this same frame of mind. Calling someone before the church today would not only invite a law suit (over against what Paul says about that) but it would also bring the questioning disdain from many of the other members of the church. “Why, who in the world gave them the right to call this person out for their actions?” That would be the thought of many of the people because many of them recognize that such church action could also apply to them if they allow certain things into their lives. So, what is done today? The situation is hardly ever dealt with. “I’m just hoping that they will work out their problems” is often the statement. “I really don’t think we should get involved” is also readily heard. The church leaders just look the other way, continue to do as they are doing, and hope that the problem doesn’t get any worse. The idea of dealing with the situation in the proper way and keeping the body of Christ free from “infection” is never seriously considered. The Pastor and church leaders cannot pass off the responsibility to someone else to solve the problem at hand. They must step up as leaders and exhibit that leadership if things are going to work as they should.

This writer is not under the false impression that such an approach to church life will ever be practiced again. That is not what he is expecting. The purpose of this little essay is to point out again what many already know but don’t want to address: the modern day acceptance of tolerance is killing the influence of the church by degrees. In fact, the world gives the church only an occasional glance and that only when it is deemed helpful. They will still occasionally appeal to the church but mostly when their actions have developed into something so serious that they have to turn to the church for help. Because of the adoption of the attitude of tolerance toward sin, the church has lost and is losing its moral and spiritual ability to influence society and be the preservative we were meant to be. The day in which the church was viewed as the “glue” which held society together morally and spiritually is quickly vanishing. When people drive by a church on Sunday their thought is something like this: “well, those people have chosen to spend their time in church but I choose to spend my time at the lake today.” “If they want to go to church, that’s o.k. but I’ts also o.k. for me not to go.” The necessity of a strong spiritual nation has vanished and that fact is due in large part to the fact that the church has accepted tolerance as her operative norm.

So, we have come to a day when the things such as drinking, smoking in public (by a woman), public profanity, adultery, non attendance in church and other situations which brought strong disapproval from the church body no longer even rate on the scale and which are practiced by not a few of the members. We have drifted into a day when one must commit some gross action before they would have to even worry much about how the church people feel about it. The Body of Christ is meant to be pure before the world in order to be an agent of salvation. But, in this day, the Body of Christ (church) is guilty of sins to the same degree that the world is guilty. We are not suppose to be viewed as a good moral and spiritual entity simply because we have fewer people harboring sin in their lives than the world at large. It is meant that we should set the example of holy living to mark the difference Jesus makes in our lives. We are suppose to be held to a higher standard than the world. How can we be used to save people from something that we are guilty of to the same degree? Tolerance is killing the influence we are suppose to have in and on the world. I am delighted to be able to say that the church has many, many people who are seeking to serve God and give the proper witness in the world to His life changing power. They are functioning within the church as God is leading them to do. Without them, the church would be totally absorbed. They are the faithful who would totally agree with what has been stated here and are acutely aware of what has been discussed. They are easily picked out of the crowd by someone who spiritually aware. We should thank God that such a remnant is in our midst.

Once ground is given up it is twice as hard to reclaim, but we must seek to return the church to a day in which purity was deemed necessary and in which the Church was internally concerned about its own holiness. Tolerance is the poison by-word of the church’s acceptance of sin in its midst. And, as long as that is the situation, Christianity will become weaker and weaker. Our strength is found in winning people to Jesus and standing against sin. We lost our strength when we cease to fulfill those functions. May heaven send us a genuine Holy Spirit led revival which will capture our hearts and refocus our commitment to being His spiritual Body on planet earth.

Leave a Comment:

All fields with “*” are required

 characters available

Jim P

In your article Dr. Harrell you use the phrase political correctness. It can’t be escaped. Politics permeates all of life. It can’t be avoided and with it labeling those who are not ‘politically correct’ goes along with it.

But cornering people with ‘politically incorrect’ labels can backfire. And example:

In Acts 11:26, The followers of Jesus where labeled with a word meant to mock them. The word was ‘Christian.’ Intended to mock it meant ‘those little Christs.’ God took what the world tried to make fun of as an opportunity to confirm what He held precious.

As God did in, “The stone which the builders rejected became the chief corner stone.”

Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. So it was that for a whole year they assembled with the church and taught a great many people. And the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch.

Sadly, many today, who call themselves ‘Christian’ (a little Christ), can’t work together to help each other with what it means to be a ‘Christian,’ ( to be ‘a little Christ’). It’s so much easier just to throw ‘politically incorrect’ labels at each other then work together to live being ‘a little Christ.’

William Thornton

“…smoking in public (by a woman)…”

OK, you got me there. I haven’t given much thought to that one. Wasn’t aware of any biblical condemnation of that.

    Baptist wife

    How about smoking in public (by a man). How many more things are there for which women should be disciplined, while men should not?

    Demetrius Gentry

    Hey yeah I don’t get that one either. Smoking in public by a woman. I am a former smoker myself but after being born again the Lord took that away from me through prayer along with alcohol. And this is defiling the temple. And the Lord will bring destruction upon those who do.

Jim P

Curt Cameron recently got a lot of criticism because of a comment he made about women need to submit to the leadership of their husbands.

What he missed is the context where the Apostle Paul made that directive in Ephesians:

Eph. 5:22 ¶ Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord.
Eph. 5:23 For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body.
Eph. 5:24 Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.
Eph. 5:25 ¶ Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her,

Look at that. Would wives submit to a husband who loved them as Christ loved the Church????

The context for both Husband and the Wife is that both want to be sanctified and separated for God’s use in a God rejecting world. Let’s put things in their true context.

Curt Cameron like many believer don’t understand the purposes of God’s work.

Do you want God’s way, the way of Christ, to be a Christian, a little Christ? We know the world doesn’t. For Curt Cameron and Believers who think this is just a universal statement for all people, they are wrong.

If both believing husband and wife say yes, they want God’s way, then they work to become an testimony to the Gospel to a lost world and discipline is just part of that working at it.

Demetrius Gentry

And the last post a paraphrase. Here is the scripture word for word regarding smoking. Along with a couple of others. Know ye not that ye are the temple of God and that’s the spirit of God dwells in you? If any man defile the temple of God him shall God destroy for the temple of God is Holy which Temple you are 1st Corinthians 316 through 17
We are bought with a price therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit which are gods 1st Corinthians 6:20
Having therefore these promises dearly beloved let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of Flesh and spirit perfecting holiness in the fear of God 2nd Corinthians 7:1

    JIm P


    I understand what you are saying. Here are some verses for added perspective:

    1Cor. 6:12 ¶ All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.
    1Cor. 6:13 Foods for the stomach and the stomach for foods, but God will destroy both it and them…

    Much of this above ‘things’ are according to one’s own conscience and the right or wrong is within the conscience of the person, whether they want to go forward in the Lord, like the habits mentioned above come under that category.

    Other things are just plain immoral and need discipling by the church as a whole, for the church to go forward as a whole.


    What about all the Southern Baptists consuming high-fructose corn-syrup, or those who daily consume the mood-altering drug we know as caffeine? It’s bad enough that MEN do such things, but WOMEN???!!! I never thought I’d see the day!!!


Jim P


Did you know Coffee is an anti-depressant, and, Diid you know that Americans drink more coffee than anyone else in the world?

I wonder if there might be a connection there?

Leave a Comment:

All fields with “*” are required

 characters available