Archive for Islam
“Common Ground” or Common Deception?
Posted by: | Comments
Our podcast this week seems to have stirred up some folks, yet there has been no meaningful refutation offered of the basis for all this consternation, specifically Dr. Ergun Caner’s claim that use of the Camel Method by our International Mission Board is deceptive and that the method contains heresy. Admittedly, I’m no expert on these matters; others are far more able to speak to the specifics of what the Camel Method is and what it teaches. For example, our friend and former contributor, Dr. Bart Barber, wrote a lengthy series of posts, which can be found by clicking here, and ultimately concluded that the Camel method is deceptive and in error.
As I understand it, the Camel Method is part of a larger missiological movement known as “Common Ground.” As it relates to evangelism among Muslims, I suppose the name speaks for itself. Today I came across a guest post on the blog Biblical Missiology. It was written by a Christian from a Muslim background, and I was fascinated by his perspective on this “Common Ground” movement. Particularly intriguing to me were the questions he asked regarding the so-called “converts” that result from this approach. Here is his paragraph containing those questions:
And so following some years in closeness with Common Ground movement, still there were a lot of unresolved questions within myself! Should CMBs (Christians from a Muslim Background) continue to attend mosques and would that be helpful for them? If that is the situation what happens after the Islamic congregation understands there are some different Muslims in their congregation? Will they tolerate, expel or persecute them? Where will they get their true spiritual nourishment? Perhaps they will meet in home groups in addition to attending mosque, but for how long that situation will last? What about church planting since they are supposed to stay within the Islamic culture and religion, will it be established at some point the Christian community or such a thing is not necessary? What about their identity, is it like Christian with Christians and Muslims with Muslims? Who are going to be their true brothers and sisters, Muslims or Christians or both of them? Is there any compromise in all of that? These were some questions I faced and am quite sure most of these believers do go through.
The entire post can be accessed by clicking here, and I encourage readers to take the time to read about the experiences of this former Muslim who believes that this deceptive approach is doing more harm than good.
Podcast Episode 21
Posted by: | Comments
Timid. Reserved. Reticent. All of these are fine adjectives, and none of them describe our guest on this week’s podcast. Dr. Ergun Caner, president of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, joins us for a conversation that ranges from apologetics to camels to task forces. Also this week, we welcomed our newest team member at SBC Today, David Worley, though he found out it’s difficult to get a word in edgewise. He’ll be more prepared next week, I’m sure.
Listen to the podcast using the player below, or visit our iTunes page to subscribe. A click on the link in the sidebar (or on the image in this post) will take you there, and while you’re at it, write us a review or give us a rating. And as always, we welcome your comments here on issues we discuss or on how we can improve the podcast. Thanks for listening.
Links to items discussed:
A Resource From Dr. Emir Caner
Posted by: | CommentsSBC Today is proud to announce another quality resource our readers may find beneficial. Recently inaugurated President of Truett McConnell College, Dr. Emir Caner, has updated his web site. Dr. Caner’s site contains all sorts of multimedia as well as a daily news summary involving the Islamic world. Additionally, he has started a weekly blog entry on the major issues of the day. Below we post his first article for his site.
Harvard, the United Nations, and Militant Islam:
How Liberals in the West Enable Islamic Violence
In an email intended to be kept private, Harvard Islamic chaplain Taha Abdul-Basser endorsed the traditional punishment for leaving the Islamic faith, the death penalty. The final paragraph of the email reads:
I would finally note that there is great wisdom (hikma) associated with the established and preserved position (capital punishment) and so, even if it makes some uncomfortable in the face of the hegemonic modern human rights discourse, one should not dismiss it out of hand. The formal consideration of excuses for the accused and the absence of Muslim governmental authority in our case here in the North/West is for dealing with the issue practically. And Allah knows best.
According to this educated cleric who serves one of America’s leading institutions, the only barrier in implementing Islamic law on America is the present “governmental authority” and the “modern rights discourse.” In other words, pesky democracy and anti-Islamic freedoms are rudely, and perhaps temporarily, standing in the way of true peace as defined by traditional Islamic thought.
Basser’s advocacy of violence should not be surprising, especially considering that capital punishment for apostasy was implemented by the prophet himself. Muhammad stated clearly, “If a Muslim changes his Islamic religion, kill him” (Bukhari hadith 9.57). In fact, the very next verse in thehadith – the sayings of Muhammad – details the execution of a Jew turned Muslim who reverted back to his old faith. Muhammad demanded this infidel’s death and then subsequently went to dinner and flippantly discussed various issues of the day. The peaceful prophet slept peacefully that night.
Now, fourteen centuries later, Western liberals are only enabling the violence wrought within traditional Islam. While an Islamic chaplain advocates the death of millions of infidels across the globe, Harvard remains as cowardly and silent as a Scandinavian government discussing the cartoons of Muhammad. Perhaps the leaders at Harvard will also apologize for the narrow-minded views of the West and their inability to understand the enlightening aspects of Islamic law. More likely, the administrators were blinded by the $20 million endowment given by the Saudi royal family to begin an Islamic Studies program. Receiving millions of dollars from a nation the proudly adheres to beheadings and maiming (Qur’an 5:33) has a way of being kinder and gentler with Islamofascists.
Of course, the liberal track record of bestowing privileges to the most deserving of nations is less than pristine. The United Nations gave Libya, which rejected the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the high honor of chairing the United Nations Human Rights Commission. In return for the privilege, Libya continued to follow Islamic law and exile, imprison, and kill innocent citizens. Surprisingly, Libya was not cited for any violations of human rights that year…
And now, America has changed. We no longer speak about a “war on terror,” but only contingency plans. Now, according to our own Department of Homeland Security, terrorists are defined as those right-wing, pro-life,anti-immigration, men and women who desire limited government and constitutional freedoms. Their definition of a terrorist makes it more likely that the government is watching a Southerner than a Saudi. According to our own government, you are most likely more dangerous to the world if you are named Bubba and not Osama. As Basser so aptly states, “Allah knows best.”
.
Enhanced Podcast:
We are grateful to Dr. Ergun Caner for providing to us his perspective on the recent firing of a Christian wrestling coach by a Muslim high school principal in Dearborn, Michigan. Ergun Mehmet Caner is the President and Dean of 

