Author Archive

Sep
18

A New SBC

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (8)

One of the criticisms often bandied about in the transition that Southern Baptist Life is undergoing is that people have to realize this isn’t the 1950’s anymore.  I’m grateful for the wakeup call because I was just about to make a run to the local Gibson’s on the corner :)  I think it might surprise some that I agree the SBC is long overdue for transition – or perhaps a better word is renewal.  Often organizations cycle through a vicious sequence that can lead to demise, decay, and even death.  It’s why I embrace the concept of a resurgence centered on the Great Commission – such is an impetus that could bring unity and clarity.  I think much of the murmuring that is bubbling up in the meantime is the natural byproduct of what happens in the midst of transition.  The question becomes how do we bring people along that are resistant and perhaps comfortable where they are?  I think the following might offer a few suggestions that could help facilitate the process.

Rebuild trust.  Help everyone feel like they are in this process together.  There is a perception in some circles of Southern Baptist Life that some groups are receiving a larger share of input than others because of their position or connections.  I know from many conversations that small church pastors feel disconnected from the process.  I can sense from the reaction of some state convention presidents that some too feel detached from the process.  I’m sure the initial launch that spoke of bloated bureaucracies (while at times true) was perceived as threatening. There is the perception that the megachurch network has a preconceived agenda about the Cooperative Program and the SBC.   I think that the listening sessions are a key component, but I would dispense members of the task force to board meetings, network gatherings, and other venues to make sure that perception does not become the defined reality.  Use venues from Baptist Press to upstart blogs to communicate the necessity of renewal and resurgence.  Tell us the truth – the whole truth about what we need to say adios to.  If NAMB needs to be restructured or even reinvented or merged let us know.  I, for one, am not threatened by dismounting horses that need to be put out to pasture whatever they may be.

Continually define the purpose.  Take us out of the wilderness into the Promised Land.  Different is not necessarily bad.  Different is not necessarily good.  Define the new beginning in images and symbols that resonate with the SBC.  Make sure the “official reason” for change is the “official reason” for transition.  Some people always believe that there are hidden agendas driving change: power plays, personality clashes, and the good old boy system.  Tell us what the purpose of the Great Commission Task Force is.  Tell us over and over again until we “get it”.  Realize that people integrally involved in the SBC may overreact and feel shortchanged.  Not all such folks should be written off as laggards and malcontents – they might just be struggling through the transition.  Paint a picture of what the resurgence will look like.  Help us walk through this with you.  One suggestion would be to allow a mechanism for every Southern Baptist to communicate their ideas and concerns.  Make certain this mechanism is widely communicated.

Buy into the vision yourself.  One of my complaints in past restructuring is that key proponents of the change are no longer even on the SBC scene.  They are AWOL and disengaged from Southern Baptist life.  I am a loyal Southern Baptist and I want loyal Southern Baptists guiding the ship.  We are not starting from scratch but attempting to bring about a resurgence that will lead to new ventures and an expansion of the Kingdom of God.  I want to know that those guiding us to burn some ships will be with us in the future.  Give us an idea of when and how the plan will be unveiled.  Don’t wait until May to tell us what the changes will be.  Give us plenty of time to digest, pray for, and work through the implications of the proposed new steps.  Tell us what has to immediately change, what will take time, and what is absolutely off the table in terms of change.   Above all, make sure the change is initiated and directed by God.  Be willing to scrap the whole enterprise if God is not in it.   I, for one, will pray for God to lead you and us toward a new beginning.

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (8)
Sep
09

Quixote, Peyote, and Coyotes

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (13)

The current debate over the perceived generational divide in the SBC brings forth a variety of conclusions. The emerging church has its roots in Leadership Network Symposiums to reach Generation X. Much morphing has transformed this movement into a polyglot of expressions. Yet one of the unexamined assumptions of the generational emphasis is the pragmatic idea that serves as the underpinning of its practice: the church growth movement outlined by Donald McGavran in his book, The Bridges of God. This movement evolved into various expressions, but many that embrace its philosophy believe it is the only valid way to fulfill the Great Commission. Scores of books and studies analyze the effectiveness of this movement and the risk of this short article is oversimplification. Three basic principles underscore the church growth mantra. The first is God wants unevangelized people evangelized. Lost people matter to God. The second essential rationale of the church growth movement theorizes that valid scientific research can reveal the obstacles to growth and the causes of growth and research can be conducted to enhance effective ministry. Much of ministry in SBC Life has this basic premise at heart. The third idea is to formulate strategies based on the conduction of this research. Church plants and plans result from such strategies. In fact, some may think this article is a Quixotic attempt at tilting at windmills. Such a pragmatic argument is anticipated.

Without splitting hairs and engendering debate on the dichotomy that often emerges in what Eugene Peterson calls the Great Omission of the Great Commission: making disciples, I want to challenge a couple of assumptions that form the foundation of the philosophy known as the church growth movement. One is the incessant need by some to somehow study cultures or even generations to target that age group with a worship style or church expression that results in the development of a congregation that is mainly composed of a particular age group. One point of such emphases is at times to disparage the existing form of the church at large and send out flyers insisting this isn’t your Grandma’s church. The unintended consequence (or perhaps anticipated) is a church that is ‘targeted’ at youngsters while devaluing the contributions of older adults (and perhaps a direct contradiction of the imperative of Titus 2). Proponents of this approach suggest: it works so don’t curse what God is blessing. Success in numbers is trumpeted to suggest the validity of the practice as culturally relevant. Critics are charged with not wanting church growth or a parochial mindset. The unanticipated consequence, if not clearly articulated and examined, is the downplaying of biblical distinctives such as the admonition that the dividing walls have fallen as in Galatians 3:28 (no Jew or Greek, male or female, in Christ Jesus). The temptation with such a strategy is to fit the gospel into the culture by adopting and adapting methodology in a capitulation to the extant culture. Today it may be alcohol. Tomorrow it could be peyote.

The danger in such a dynamic is the reduction of the church to a pragmatic tool. Van Gelder has suggested we use “church” as a noun rather than as an adjective. Perhaps the obstacle that needs to be removed for us to ‘be’ the church rather than just ‘do’ church is to realize that God will build His church and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it. Reformulating biblical language to make it user-friendly often dumbs down our worship and leads to biblical illiteracy. If you can learn to order at Starbucks you can sure learn the biblical meaning of propitiation. Downplaying biblical distinctives as not to offend the crowd is at best a misunderstanding of the imperative to preach the whole counsel of God. Embracing research without the understanding that real church growth is necessarily ‘supernatural’ engenders man-centered and pragmatic tendencies. Trumpeting God’s grace while dismissing God’s wrath creates an unbalanced gospel. It’s like killing all the coyotes to save the cute rabbits. There are new plants and churches that are faithfully strategizing and supernaturally multiplying. May God add to their number! Above all may the church be the church to the glory of God.

Aug
28

Paradox Lost – Part II

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (5)

Many argue do not discount how God is using the contemporary church to impact the age. No doubt! Often, though, the arrogance of those engaged in the contemporary sees revolution when what is at work is disillusion, confusion, and many contusions among the body of Christ. Those who dismiss the church as irrelevant forget their own souls have been forged on the anvil of the very altar they wish to discard. Postmodernism is not the final word. Jesus said he would build the church to a triumphant conclusion. That is why an additional corrective to some strident voices of the contemporary church needs to be offered to all leaders. The church will always be relevant. It is not our task to make the church relevant but to be the church period. We live in a paradox where the ancient words of the Ancient of Days are as living as the day God breathed them forth, and yet those words must be lived out. This is the test of every movement. It is not ultimately about form but function. It is not a pragmatic measurement of what works but of God’s workmanship. The seductive sirens of prepackaged publications offer a new and improved solution for every problem that plagues the programs of our day.
Read More→

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (5)
Aug
19

Paradox Lost – Part One

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (7)

Perhaps the best metaphor to describe the contemporary church, with apologies to John Milton, is Paradox Lost. Somewhere along the line many church leaders have forgotten what Randy Alcorn calls the grace and truth paradox.[i] We must be full of grace and truth (John 1:14). When Jesus walked this earth, he gave us an invariable paradigm to follow often expressed by the prepositions in but not of:

I have given them Your Word; and the world has hated them, because they are not of this world, even as I am not of this world. I do not ask you to take them out of this world, but keep them from the evil one. They are not of this world, even as I am not of the world. Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth. As you have sent Me into the world I also have sent them into the world. (John 17:14-18).

Read More→

Comments (7)
Jul
30

Kitchen Tables and Interventions

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (7)

The way I write is actually fairly simple – it’s much like birthing a sermon. You incubate it in prayer, research it in study, and wrestle with it until you have a burden you believe is from God that you must communicate. With apologies to Martin Luther, my burden for this article was birthed at the kitchen table. It was a discussion about a family member leaving her husband and the resulting unintended consequences of the divorce. The typical topics emerged – the pursuit of personal happiness, emotional abuse, and the bottom line offered in most such conversations in American life: it’s my life butt out. Not much to create a writer’s burden or lift writer’s block but the seeds started sprouting fairly quickly. The seminal seed that took root in my thoughts was what role the church should or could play in such a situation. How could the church most effectively be the church in this situation? Both participants in this family fiasco are believers that frequent a local Baptist church. This is not a case of ministering to or reaching unbelievers.

Read More→

Categories : Church, Convictions, Family
Comments (7)

You probably should not post about a tweet (a relatively new discovery for a Twitter novice like me), but it does encapsulate a sentiment that’s been brewing in my brain for some time. Here’s the retweet I received from Rick Warren, “If unbelievers like what they see, they’ll listen to what we say.” I heard several variants of the refrain at the SBC convention and wanted to raise my hand, interrupt politely, and yell in French “Au Contraire”! Decorum and civility got the better of my impulse, so here’s my attempt at a response. From the get-go let me acknowledge the post is filled with land-mines that will probably set a host of folks off – and my motive is neither to caricature other viewpoints nor denigrate any attempts at Christ-following that differ from my initial contribution.

Read More→

Comments (21)
Mar
24

I Like Jesus and The Church

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (34)

I’m still waiting for the author who has the fortitude to tell us what they appear to assume to be true: Jesus is in but the church is out. This pointed remark is not a vicious slam on the need to be missional and incarnational, but it does express the disillusionment I feel when reading some of these author’s scripts that suggest the church of today doesn’t really love Jesus. I guess if I wanted to sell books I could entitle my first release I Despise Jesus but I Love the Church. That’s the ludicrous and visceral reaction that emerges when I read the tomes spewing out of Zondervan, Thomas Nelson, Jossey-Bass and a host of other sources.

Everything Must Change, They Like Jesus but not the Church, The New Christians, Lord, Save us from Your Followers. The thoughts beneath the surface of these titles often lack any subtlety – the church of America’s recent past really doesn’t get Jesus. Dan Kimball, Sarah Cunningham, Tony Jones, Brian McLaren, Dan Merchant and a plethora of other self-titled postmoderns all have released books built around the same theme: God save us from your followers because the generation of today isn’t into the contemporary expression of the church. No doubt some of the ideas offered are needed missives and a call to mission. That’s fair game and a necessary dialogue. Often though what happens is what they claim to hate: generalize, build a straw man, and then burn it up. Southern Baptists, in particular, are an irresistible target. I’ll resist quote mining or proof-texting, but let me offer some observations that might be a tad different than much of the offerings that publishers so rapidly push to the press. Read More→

Categories : Church
Comments (34)

e41134.jpgI would be a bit embarrassed if we were not one of the first to promote this excellent new tome that came forth from the efforts of the Center for Theological Research and the Smith Center for Leadership Development at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Thomas White, Jason B. Duesing and Malcolm Yarnell III edit a book longing for the recovery of Baptist identity and integrity entitled Restoring Integrity in Baptist Churches.

The book endeavors to examine how current trends and events have led to a loss of Baptist identity and purpose. The work also attempts to demonstrate how maintaining or regaining the integrity of the local church does not render the ecclesia irrelevant or ineffective. In light of Willow Creek’s recent research that retooling and revisioning needs to occur, perhaps Baptist leaders might be more prone to take a second look at biblical ecclesiology as a corrective to pragmatic marketing techniques. Essays on church membership, baptism, the Lord’s Supper, church discipline, and the priesthood of the believers are written by a host of scholars including Mark Dever, Daniel Akin, Malcolm Yarnell, and Emir Caner.

The introduction, ably done by Thomas White, mentions five major challenges to Baptist ecclesiology. It serves as a reminder to some and an eye-opening corrective to others. The challenges run the gamut from a culture of extreme individualism to the emergence of the megachurch. Let me leave you with a quote and a suggestion. I suggest you take time to order this collection and chew on its contents. I am certain not all on the plate will appeal to every reader, but no one will go away without much to digest. The quote might engender a bit of discussion and even a quibble here and there. Still, the conversation over the proffered offering will be well worth the time:

Perhaps the biggest challenge confronting Baptist churches is the “seeker sensitive” movement. This movement positively seeks to remove unneeded barriers to reaching people with the gospel of Jesus Christ. At the same time, most seeker-focused churches do not practice church discipline. Few things could be less seeker-oriented than the act of publicly disciplining a member for improper behavior. Most, if not all, seeker churches do not practice the strictest form of Communion, limited to members only, and many do not practice Communion with like faith and practice, commonly called close Communion. Seeker churches tend to practice open Communion, with a few not making any statement at all about the Lord’s Supper being for believers only. Restrictions placed on the Lord’s Table could come across as not being seeker-friendly to many visitors. Controversial doctrines like believer’s baptism by immersion do not receive extensive discussion in seeker-sensitive churches. This clearly biblical doctrine historically has been very important to Baptist tradition but does not fit nicely within the seeker-sensitive tradition.

Bon Appetit!

Comments (28)
Nov
22

Baptist Thanks

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (3)

I’m not much for trite sayings during this time of season.  I’ve made up a satirical song for thanksgiving about Mr. Turkey, but I’ll spare you the sing-a-long.  I’ve also been somewhat AWOL in the blogging community because doctoral work has been overwhelming.  There is a season for everything, and I appreciate my fellow bloggers for carrying my dead weight.  

 In keeping with the central theme of this blog – I want to tell you how thankful I am for my Baptist heritage.  It’s a passion and vision that remains rooted and real in my own life.   As a historian it’s important that names like Lottie Moon not become relics relegated to the distant memories of a fading generation.   I am thankful for the Cooperative Program that helps pay my tuition at Southern Seminary in doctoral work and contributed to my M.Div at Southwestern.  I am thankful for the vast army of missionaries serving sacrificially at home and abroad.  I could take hours to spell out the vast contributions Southern Baptists have made just in my family. 

Many call us the establishment blog.  I tend to differ with this assessment because all of us believe there is much in Baptist life that needs attention.  It remains my contention that many that are villified, satirized, and caricatured in Baptist life are staunch stalwarts of the Christian faith.   Some that I thought from characterizations of others were somehow tainted and inapproachable have from personal observation and interaction demonstrated tremendous civility, approachability, and exhibited grace in the midst of adversity.  Thanks to all who serve diligently to see the Kingdom of God grow and expand.

Categories : Baptist Identity
Comments (3)
Oct
01

Revisionists and Baptist Dissent

Posted by: Joe Stewart | Comments (55)

We are pleased to present, in our latest audio resource, a sermon series on “Those Darn Baptists” preached by Ronnie W. Rogers. He serves as the senior pastor of Trinity Baptist Church in Norman, Oklahoma. Click here for biographical information about Pastor Rogers, and be sure to visit his blog.
Today, we present the second message in this series. Click below to listen to this second message in the series, then feel free to come back to this post to comment on what you’ve heard.

The continual revision of historical perspectives does much to undermine both our theology and our ecclesiology. Ronnie Rogers does an admirable job of demonstrating the fact that the hallowed phrase ‘separation of church and state’ appears nowhere in the Constitution and also frames the context of Thomas Jefferson’s correspondence with the Danbury Baptist Association. His perspective of dissenters especially in the context of Baptist stalwarts such as Obadiah Homes and John Leland are a welcome corrective to the one-sided drum beat that continually strips the public square of any reference to the Lord. Attempts to adjust the establishment clause and reinterpret the free exercise portion of the First Amendment have created a place where references to God are politically incorrect in the public domain. The sermon leaves me with a couple of burning questions which I hope are not the result of heartburn.

  • How do we as Baptists maintain a true conception of religious liberty with the current reconstruction of the First Amendment?
  • Do you think pastors of today would be willing to suffer such persecution to maintain the biblical distinctive of believer’s baptism by immersion?
 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast [47:02m]: Play Now | Play in Popup
Comments (55)