<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abandoning Doctrinal Fidelity for the Lowest Common Denominator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/</link>
	<description>Restoring Unity through Biblical Discipleship and Baptist Identity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:53:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baptist Identity and Theological Triage &#171; Provocations &#38; Pantings</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-2/#comment-8716</link>
		<dc:creator>Baptist Identity and Theological Triage &#171; Provocations &#38; Pantings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8716</guid>
		<description>[...] common denominator&#8221; in particular with reference to Mark Driscoll at Southeastern Seminary.  In one of his articles, Foster writes, There is a systematic diverting of attention from doctrinal fidelity by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] common denominator&#8221; in particular with reference to Mark Driscoll at Southeastern Seminary.  In one of his articles, Foster writes, There is a systematic diverting of attention from doctrinal fidelity by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gospel: Our Greatest Common Denominator &#171; Provocations &#38; Pantings</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-2/#comment-8708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gospel: Our Greatest Common Denominator &#171; Provocations &#38; Pantings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8708</guid>
		<description>[...] reflecting a lack of commitment to Baptist identity.  The talking point quickly became the &#8220;lowest common denominator&#8221; implying that the cooperation they enjoy comes at the expense of upholding Baptist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reflecting a lack of commitment to Baptist identity.  The talking point quickly became the &#8220;lowest common denominator&#8221; implying that the cooperation they enjoy comes at the expense of upholding Baptist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cross</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-8591</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8591</guid>
		<description>Not that it is for me to extend, of course. God takes care of that all by Himself. &quot;Recognize what God has already done&quot; is a better way to see it by far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it is for me to extend, of course. God takes care of that all by Himself. &#8220;Recognize what God has already done&#8221; is a better way to see it by far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cross</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-8590</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8590</guid>
		<description>Robin,

I&#039;ll take it and extend it to you as well. That is the category that makes the most difference of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take it and extend it to you as well. That is the category that makes the most difference of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Casper</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-2/#comment-8589</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Casper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8589</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading the thoughts of David for the past few years...and I&#039;d take this &quot;Plymouth Brethren&quot; like Southern Baptist any day.  He articulates well an attitude of partnership around the fundamentals as Baptists to touch a lost and hurting world with the never changing gospel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading the thoughts of David for the past few years&#8230;and I&#8217;d take this &#8220;Plymouth Brethren&#8221; like Southern Baptist any day.  He articulates well an attitude of partnership around the fundamentals as Baptists to touch a lost and hurting world with the never changing gospel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rogers</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-2/#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8588</guid>
		<description>Steve,

That would be a good question to ask CB, since he is the one who brought up the whole question of Plymouth Brethren in the first place.

From my understanding, both Open and Exclusive assemblies have the same historical roots. The assemblies I am most familiar with in Spain tend more towards the Open stance, though there are some more Exclusive assemblies as well. 

I did write a blogpost once, referencing Plymouth Brethren, here:

http://loveeachstone.blogspot.com/2008/01/plymouth-brethren-william-macdonald-and.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>That would be a good question to ask CB, since he is the one who brought up the whole question of Plymouth Brethren in the first place.</p>
<p>From my understanding, both Open and Exclusive assemblies have the same historical roots. The assemblies I am most familiar with in Spain tend more towards the Open stance, though there are some more Exclusive assemblies as well. </p>
<p>I did write a blogpost once, referencing Plymouth Brethren, here:</p>
<p><a href="http://loveeachstone.blogspot.com/2008/01/plymouth-brethren-william-macdonald-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://loveeachstone.blogspot.com/2008/01/plymouth-brethren-william-macdonald-and.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-2/#comment-8587</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8587</guid>
		<description>By &quot;Plymouht Brethren&quot; David, do you mean Exclusive Brethren (which is what the name implies in this country) or the other main group, the Open Brethren?

Wikipedia says &quot;A clearer difference between Open- and Exclusive assemblies is in the nature of relationships between meetings. Open Brethren meetings are generally local assemblies that are autonomous but often informally linked with each other. Exclusive Brethren are generally &quot;connexional&quot; and so recognize the obligation to recognize and adhere to the disciplinary actions of other associated assemblies. One practical result of this might be that, among Open Brethren, should a member be &quot;disciplined&quot; in one assembly, other assemblies may feel free to allow the member to break bread with them, if they are not concerned by whatever caused the disciplinary action of the one in question. 
Another less clear difference between assemblies lies in their approaches to collaborating with other Christians. Some Open Brethren will hold Gospel meetings, youth events or other activities in partnership with Evangelical Christian churches, while others (and perhaps the majority of Exclusive Brethren) tend not to support activities outside their own meetings.
The Plymouth Brethren are, generally, dispensational, pre-tribulational, premillennial and cessational in their theology and have much in common with other conservative evangelical Christian groups. &quot;


Many thanks
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;Plymouht Brethren&#8221; David, do you mean Exclusive Brethren (which is what the name implies in this country) or the other main group, the Open Brethren?</p>
<p>Wikipedia says &#8220;A clearer difference between Open- and Exclusive assemblies is in the nature of relationships between meetings. Open Brethren meetings are generally local assemblies that are autonomous but often informally linked with each other. Exclusive Brethren are generally &#8220;connexional&#8221; and so recognize the obligation to recognize and adhere to the disciplinary actions of other associated assemblies. One practical result of this might be that, among Open Brethren, should a member be &#8220;disciplined&#8221; in one assembly, other assemblies may feel free to allow the member to break bread with them, if they are not concerned by whatever caused the disciplinary action of the one in question.<br />
Another less clear difference between assemblies lies in their approaches to collaborating with other Christians. Some Open Brethren will hold Gospel meetings, youth events or other activities in partnership with Evangelical Christian churches, while others (and perhaps the majority of Exclusive Brethren) tend not to support activities outside their own meetings.<br />
The Plymouth Brethren are, generally, dispensational, pre-tribulational, premillennial and cessational in their theology and have much in common with other conservative evangelical Christian groups. &#8221;</p>
<p>Many thanks<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rogers</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-8586</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8586</guid>
		<description>CB,

A lot of my Plymouth Brethren friends in Spain would be surprised and amused to hear someone call my Plymouth Brethren. But, if it makes you happy, call me whatever you please. There&#039;s not a whole lot I can do about it, anyway. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CB,</p>
<p>A lot of my Plymouth Brethren friends in Spain would be surprised and amused to hear someone call my Plymouth Brethren. But, if it makes you happy, call me whatever you please. There&#8217;s not a whole lot I can do about it, anyway. <img src='http://sbctoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Foster</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-8585</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8585</guid>
		<description>Alan

How about this category:

Brother-in-Christ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan</p>
<p>How about this category:</p>
<p>Brother-in-Christ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cross</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/13/abandoning-doctrinal-fidelity-for-the-lowest-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-8584</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/?p=468#comment-8584</guid>
		<description>CB,

I have found that for years now I don&#039;t fit into any categories at all. It can frustrate those who like to categorize and it often frustrates me as well. 

Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CB,</p>
<p>I have found that for years now I don&#8217;t fit into any categories at all. It can frustrate those who like to categorize and it often frustrates me as well. </p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
