Comments on: Closed Communion and Inerrancy Part II http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii A forum for Baptists to dialogue about how best to fulfill God’s calling in our lives. Mon, 21 May 2012 23:41:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Wally http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8333 Wally Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:26:08 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8333 Rex Yes this seem to be a hotbed for comments going away and time stamps being changed. These fellows Ronnie Duke Cb scott and vol seem to know their way around. I havn't seen thhis ronnie duke fellow on other blogs. Maybe he will visit my bkog for the saad news on the death pf my good friend. Wally Rex

Yes this seem to be a hotbed for comments going away and time stamps being changed.
These fellows Ronnie Duke Cb scott and vol seem to know their way around. I havn’t seen thhis ronnie duke fellow on other blogs. Maybe he will visit my bkog for the saad news on the death pf my good friend.

Wally

]]> By: Byroniac http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8332 Byroniac Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:32:22 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8332 Volfan007, I am sorry for not responding to you sooner. David Rogers and Chris Johnson said everything I wanted to say (and more than I knew to say). On the other hand, David Brumbelow's comment 57 was excellent. I have learned from this discussion, but I have not finished reading all of it, and I hope to do so later. I also understand (I think) where Rex Ray is coming from. Volfan007,

I am sorry for not responding to you sooner. David Rogers and Chris Johnson said everything I wanted to say (and more than I knew to say). On the other hand, David Brumbelow’s comment 57 was excellent. I have learned from this discussion, but I have not finished reading all of it, and I hope to do so later.

I also understand (I think) where Rex Ray is coming from.

]]> By: cb scott http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8331 cb scott Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:59:23 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8331 Vol, I am sorry. That was not Ronnie Duke. That was me. I forgot to remove his name. I think I am going to send that kid back home sooner than planned. Do you remember when he was here before and threw up all over Tim Rogers and Tim had to go in the hospital? That was a bad day. But, you have to admit; It was kinda funny. :-) cb Vol,

I am sorry. That was not Ronnie Duke. That was me. I forgot to remove his name.

I think I am going to send that kid back home sooner than planned.

Do you remember when he was here before and threw up all over Tim Rogers and Tim had to go in the hospital?

That was a bad day. But, you have to admit; It was kinda funny.

:-)

cb

]]> By: Ronnie Duke Bigalow http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8330 Ronnie Duke Bigalow Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:54:45 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8330 Vol, You know how it is. A kid get a little older and comes to visit and thinks he can do as he pleases around your house. I do hope Wally was not offended. I guess time will tell. cb Vol,

You know how it is. A kid get a little older and comes to visit and thinks he can do as he pleases around your house.

I do hope Wally was not offended. I guess time will tell.

cb

]]> By: volfan007 http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8329 volfan007 Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:49:32 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8329 CB, :) David CB,

:)

David

]]> By: Chris Johnson http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8328 Chris Johnson Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:13:58 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8328 Brother David, That's a good point. I think our wording is somewhat different, but all in all we agree. Thanks for the explanation! Blessings, Chris Brother David,

That’s a good point. I think our wording is somewhat different, but all in all we agree. Thanks for the explanation!

Blessings,
Chris

]]> By: Ronnie Duke Bigalow http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8327 Ronnie Duke Bigalow Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:03:07 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8327 Yes Sir!!! Yes Sir!!!

]]> By: cb scott http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8326 cb scott Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:58:08 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8326 R.Duke, PLease stay off of my computer. Sorry Wally. cb R.Duke,

PLease stay off of my computer.

Sorry Wally.

cb

]]> By: Ronnie Duke Bigalow http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8325 Ronnie Duke Bigalow Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:55:52 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8325 Wally, You are without a clue. Wally,

You are without a clue.

]]> By: Rex Ray http://sbctoday.com/2009/02/06/closed-communion-and-inerrancy-part-ii/#comment-8324 Rex Ray Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:29:26 +0000 http://sbctoday.com/?p=453#comment-8324 Wally, The # 47 comment tells me to consult the Good Dr. Phil. ?? Your # 50 comment got you in trouble with another friend of mine, Volfan 007. You better watch what you say around here as it seems ‘freedom of speech’ is limited since I saw two of my ‘best’ comments (my opinion) disappear with no explanation. Wally,
The # 47 comment tells me to consult the Good Dr. Phil. ??

Your # 50 comment got you in trouble with another friend of mine, Volfan 007.

You better watch what you say around here as it seems ‘freedom of speech’ is limited since I saw two of my ‘best’ comments (my opinion) disappear with no explanation.

]]>