<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Patterson on Calvinism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=patterson-on-calvinism</link>
	<description>A forum for Baptists to dialogue about how best to fulfill God’s calling in our lives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: volfan007</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>volfan007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>wow...i just read dr. pattersons&#039; paper on this.  incredible insight.   i agree with peter....any building bridges conference between calvinists and non-calvinists should have included dr. patterson speaking on this paper.  fantastic understanding.  thanks sbc today crew for this blessing.

david</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;i just read dr. pattersons&#8217; paper on this.  incredible insight.   i agree with peter&#8230;.any building bridges conference between calvinists and non-calvinists should have included dr. patterson speaking on this paper.  fantastic understanding.  thanks sbc today crew for this blessing.</p>
<p>david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Borland</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Borland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>This is a great little blog.  Thank you!  When I have free time, I&#039;ll definitely try to come here for some constructive and polite dialogue on meaningful issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great little blog.  Thank you!  When I have free time, I&#8217;ll definitely try to come here for some constructive and polite dialogue on meaningful issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Grannemann</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Grannemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-847</guid>
		<description>I once sought to reconcile predestination and free will, and thought several times that I had done it.  Finally, I did understand, that philosophers smarter than I had rightly concluded that God&#039;s sovereignty and human freedom were in fact insoluble from a human logic point-of-view.  Strict Calvinism solves the problem by going with God&#039;s sovereignty to the exclusion of human freedom.  That&#039;s at least logically consistent.  Human freedom, however, is required to have a meaningful world.

You can learn something from studying the Calvinism debate.  The problem comes, in my opinion, when you have overconfidence in your conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once sought to reconcile predestination and free will, and thought several times that I had done it.  Finally, I did understand, that philosophers smarter than I had rightly concluded that God&#8217;s sovereignty and human freedom were in fact insoluble from a human logic point-of-view.  Strict Calvinism solves the problem by going with God&#8217;s sovereignty to the exclusion of human freedom.  That&#8217;s at least logically consistent.  Human freedom, however, is required to have a meaningful world.</p>
<p>You can learn something from studying the Calvinism debate.  The problem comes, in my opinion, when you have overconfidence in your conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnson</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Joe,

I&#039;ve heard you sing....  that other Joe ain&#039;t got nothin&#039; on ya!

Blessings,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard you sing&#8230;.  that other Joe ain&#8217;t got nothin&#8217; on ya!</p>
<p>Blessings,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter lumpkins</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>peter lumpkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Wes,

This paper is stunning.  Dr. Patterson should put it to Mp3--perhaps preaching it in chapel--and make it available to every Southern Baptist.  Here, he is at his finest.

Whoever cooked up Building Bridges committed the greatest of gaffes by not serving, on the speaker&#039;s plate,  this piece of pie.

Grace.  With that, I am...

Peter

p.s.  Now if only Dr. Patterson would come around to the post-trib position, we&#039;d be doctrinally set til Jesus comes... ;^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes,</p>
<p>This paper is stunning.  Dr. Patterson should put it to Mp3&#8211;perhaps preaching it in chapel&#8211;and make it available to every Southern Baptist.  Here, he is at his finest.</p>
<p>Whoever cooked up Building Bridges committed the greatest of gaffes by not serving, on the speaker&#8217;s plate,  this piece of pie.</p>
<p>Grace.  With that, I am&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter</p>
<p>p.s.  Now if only Dr. Patterson would come around to the post-trib position, we&#8217;d be doctrinally set til Jesus comes&#8230; ;^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Stewart</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 06:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>I just hope the music minister sings better than any SBC Today host.  What a great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope the music minister sings better than any SBC Today host.  What a great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim G</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Great article guys and great comments of love and understanding.  Have we all been raptured?  :)

I say amen to all of the above in the wording, spirit, and connectivity.  God is good.

TG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article guys and great comments of love and understanding.  Have we all been raptured?  :)</p>
<p>I say amen to all of the above in the wording, spirit, and connectivity.  God is good.</p>
<p>TG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>Tim: Both. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim: Both. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Gordon</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-841</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thanks for the info on the Heyens.  And thanks for the comments in this thread.

By Grace Alone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for the info on the Heyens.  And thanks for the comments in this thread.</p>
<p>By Grace Alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin McGahey</title>
		<link>http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin McGahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbctoday.com/2007/12/03/patterson-on-calvinism/#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Yes sir.  I now understand and agree.  Thank you for your patience with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Yes sir.  I now understand and agree.  Thank you for your patience with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

